Distilling
the myth of fandom.
A short article on the cultural significance of TPDIS and other fan groups,
based upon the book 'Textual Poachers; Television Fans & Participatory
Culture' by Henry Jenkins. Pub: Routledge 1992.
Introduction:
Having recently read this book I was impressed by the way in which Henry
Jenkins views fans and fandom as a separate subculture in modern society.
What I found difficult, though, was interpreting some of the heavy sociological
jargon and wordy passages.
While reading I began to take a few simple summary notes as a means
of interpreting the text in a more manageable form. Later I decided
that they would make a good précis of Jenkins's ideas and serve
to dispel some of the stereotypical attitudes I encounter every day
from family and friends who know of my involvement in the Tomorrow People
fandom and TPDIS, the on-line discussion group, in particular.
Much of my article is my own direct interpretation of this book and
I claim no copyright to the original concepts or ideas. Whether you
are a member of the above mentioned fan group or just curious about
what makes a 'Fan' then I hope that these ideas can help to overcome
the prejudice and misunderstanding between those who simply watch TV
and those who seek to become part of the fandom.
The fan stereotype:
What makes a fan? If you have watched films like 'Galaxy Quest', 'Cruise
of the Gods' or 'Trekkers' then you will be acquainted with these common
misconceptions about sci-fi fans in particular.
1. Fans are brainless consumers of any merchandise associated with
their favourite show.
2. Fans devote their lives to the acquisition of meaningless factual
material from the show.
3. Fans place inappropriate importance to material from the show.
4. Fans are social misfits with obsessive personality types.
5. Fans are infantile and both emotionally and intellectually immature.
6. Fans cannot separate reality from fantasy.
The question you, as the reader of this article, have to ask yourself
is
Do I fit this stereotype? The answer is probably, no. No fans
that I have ever met have been the nerdy, dim-witted social misfits
that the media would like to portray us as.
So where does this stereotype come from? It lies in the origins of
the word fan, which comes from fanatic. A fanatic is like a lunatic
and has various associations with mental health problems and madness.
These people are feared by society because they choose to believe in
concepts that lie outside the accepted cultural rules and norms for
behaviour. Fans reject cultural expectations about what they should
be doing. As the fandom increases so does its strength as a group of
consumers and therefore so does its power to influence producers, merchandisers
and ultimately society. This has not gone unnoticed by those who perceive
fans and fandom as a challenge to the cultural norm.
There is, in fact, no point to this fear. Fans do not set out to change
society; however through the presence of this subculture, one that is
becoming increasingly more recognisable, society is changing itself.
Are there different types of fan?
The simple answer is, yes. According to Jenkins there are two main types
of fan for all TV and film based concepts.
a) There are those who poach ideas and ideals from what they watch and
then create a fictional world in which they can live.
b) There are also those who like to belong to a social community of
like-minded people where their own interpretations of the moral and
social guidelines laid down in the show are fully accepted.
Within these two types of fan there are also a) fan readers: Those
who just watch and read material associated with the show, and b) fan
writers: These people go beyond the material produced by commercial
TV companies and book publishers and weave their own tapestry of stories
within the genre of the show in order to add something to the myth.
Why TPDIS?
If you are a member of the internet based discussion group you may have
sat back one day and asked 'why did I join this group?' Was it simply
to keep yourself informed of news related to your favourite show or
something else, something more about belonging?
Fan groups like this provide thier members with the opportunity for
gossip and, according to Jenkins, there are four types of gossip involved.
1. House-talk: An exchange of ideas.
An example of this on TPDIS is the recent discussion of the prime barrier,
the basis for psionic powers and the nature of genetics.
2. Scandal: Judgements about moral dilemmas.
Aspects of the cast's relationship with one another, both on and off
set, are mentioned in some TPDIS posts, as well as Big Finish's plans
for the audio adventures and DVD commentaries.
3. Bitching: Expression of anger about various topics.
This aspect of gossip is heavily regulated on TPDIS, but there are still
some topics such as breaking canon, and which episodes/story-lines are
best, that cause some heated comments to be exchanged between members.
4. Chatting: Encouraging mutual self-disclosure between members.
A personal account of one's childhood memories of the show is one of
the first things most newbies mention in their posts.
The whole picture
Broadening out my summary of this book to include other sci-fi and TV
shows let me summarise the main characteristics of fandom in order that
I can convey the whole picture of what it means to be part of this subculture
living within today's society.
Firstly, a fandom has its own unique way of watching, perceiving and
interpreting TV shows. Fans don't just watch; they absorb and assimilate
the information into their own way of looking at the world. Such people
have a mixture of emotional proximity to the content of each episode
and critical detachment. They often watch and re-watch episodes trying
to make meaning of even the smallest of details.
To become a part of any series fandom, be it Dr. Who, Blake's 7, Thunderbirds,
Star Wars, Charmed, or indeed The Tomorrow People you have to first
learn the preferred reading and watching practices of your group. You
must learn and understand common abbreviations, concepts and interpretations
of technologies used by other fans. You will have to work together with
fellow group members to fill in gaps in content, derive canon and draw
parallels with real life situations.
Secondly, once you become an accepted member of any fandom you realise
that you have a certain amount of consumer power. This was never more
evident than at the recent Memorabilia fair in Birmingham, where I saw
hundreds of pounds change hands for certain items, many of which I owned
in my childhood, but have discarded as I grew up as having no apparent
value in my life, e.g. countless Star Wars figures, annuals, magazines
and books, not to mention videos. (I used to own the entire ST Next
Generation series, but practically gave it away to someone at work for
a nominal fee because it held no more interest for me.) The more people
crave such items, the more commercial outlets will produce them, but
at the same time, once a series falls out of favour with the masses,
these items lose their value overnight.
Thirdly, any fandom possesses its own cultural traditions and practices.
We write fan fiction, poems, e-mails, make videos and music all associated
with our favourite show. The production of such items adds to the genre
by giving something back that the shows' makers never envisaged.
Lastly, fandom provides an alternate social community. It offers not
mere escape, but an alternative reality more humane and democratic than
society today. Real life falls short of the ideals many fans feel. Family
values are disintegrating in society, but the 'family' atmosphere portrayed
between Kirk, Spock and McCoy, or the three sisters in 'Charmed', fills
that gap. Fans create for themselves a world that is more charitable
and accepting of difference - and TPDIS is a prime example of this -
where people do not act out of self-interest, but for the good of the
group. And that can't be bad for society either!
Final thoughts
I hope that this article offers some explanation of fandom. Perhaps
it will give you food for thought next time you hear of a Sci-fi convention
and your immediate response is to cringe about the sad fans that need
to 'get a life.' I'll finish with a poem from Jenkins's book which sums
up the emotional feelings associated with attending a convention.
"Weekend-only world" by T.J Burnside Clapp.
Fesorius Publications 1987.
In an hour of make-believe
In these warm convention halls
My mind is free to think
And feel so deeply
An intimacy never found
Inside their silent walls
In a year or more
Of what they call reality.
In my weekend-only world
That they call make believe,
Are those who share
The visions that I see
In their real-time life
That they tell me is real,
The things they cared about
Aren't real to me.
Back to top
|